两种典型中继处理策略环境下天线选择性能比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

伦理声明:



Performance comparison of antenna selection under two different typical relay strategies
Author:
Ethical statement:

Affiliation:

Funding:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    考虑到天线选择(AS)具有实现简单和性能好等优点,通过仿真评估在不同中继策略场景下天线选择的性能。评估方法如下:中继站第1时隙采用最大比合并算法(MRC),第2时隙选择中继处理后具有最大信道增益的单天线进行信号传输。仿真结果表明:与现有的分布式空时码(DSTBC)和最大比合并、最大比合并和匹配滤波(MF)算法相比,最大比合并加天线选择混合方案在转发重传(AF)和译码重传(DF)策略下都能够提供更优的合速率与误码性能;并且在中继站采用译码转发策略时,该方案表现出优于采用放大转发策略的情形。例如,当误码率(SER)等于10-3时,译码转发策略具有1 dB的信噪比(SNR)增益。

    Abstract:

    Antenna Selection(AS) has the advantages of simple implementation and good performance. The performance of AS in the relay networks with Amplify-and-Forward(AF) and Decode-and-Forward(DF) strategies is evaluated . The evaluation method is as following: the first time slot of the relay station adopts the Maximum Ratio Combining(MRC) algorithm and the second time slot selects the optimal channel which has the maximum channel gain for signal transmission. Simulation results show that the MRC plus AS can provide better information rate and Signal Noise Ratio(SNR) performance compared to the Distributed Space-Time Block Coding(DSTBC) plus Maximum Ratio Combining(MRC) or MRC plus MF. When Symbol Error Rate(SER)=10-3, the scheme in the DF based relay network achieves a 1 dB SNR gain over the scheme in the AF based network.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

黄晓晖,束 锋,刘婷婷,胡锦松,陆锦辉.两种典型中继处理策略环境下天线选择性能比较[J].太赫兹科学与电子信息学报,2017,15(2):211~214

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-09
  • 最后修改日期:2016-01-08
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-04-28
  • 出版日期:
关闭